Amo Probos: I could not have said it better myself . . .

Sunday, April 17, 2016

April 29 SCOTUS Conference on DC Madam Petition Provides Window of Opportunity for Submission of Amicus Briefs

15 comments:

Anonymous said...: By the the most recent "Last great day" of April 29th occurs significant primary elections of New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Maryland, Delaware, and Rhode Island will have occurred.
I feel the clock is being run out on you and that the conference date will only result in a further delay most probably until after June 7th when the last significant number of primaries occur.
The stated reason for wanting the order lifted in your words is that it “deprives the People of the information they may deem material to the exercise of their electoral franchise”
How strong is that argument when for all practical purposes the people have made their decision at the polls on who will represent their party?
That may well be the argument as to why the court would no longer feel compelled to lift the order.
You weren't required to take a "second bite of the apple", the court had spoken. You can withdraw the request.
Some soul searching is in order if you are sincere in arming the voters with what you say may be important information in a timely manner.
I don't envy your position.
Good luck to you.

Although your "second bite of the apple" was your request; April 17, 2016 at 11:32 AM
Unknown said...: So most likely there will be a stalemate....then what? Will you release??; April 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM
Anonymous said...: The stalling is predictable. When they finally make their decision, it won't really matter any longer.; April 17, 2016 at 10:36 PM
Anonymous said...: Attorney Sibley: If you do not want to release the name of the person who you say would impact the Presidential race- and we all assume it is Ted Cruz- then why don't we do this: If you DON'T print anything specifically on who it is, via Amo Probos by NOON April 18, 2016,then we can all assume that it IS Ted Cruz on the DC Madam's list of clients that you have. OK? That way you are not releasing any names. Your silence will be assent to the foregoing understanding. Thank you for your attention!; April 18, 2016 at 12:21 AM
Anonymous said...: Shyster cuck.; April 18, 2016 at 11:31 AM
Unknown said...: Cruz is on the list...Ashley Madison as well!; April 18, 2016 at 4:43 PM
Casey said...: Great idea!; April 18, 2016 at 10:52 PM
Unknown said...: April 29 is too late. Elections will have occurred. Courts will not lift order, just a waste of time. You either release or not, but I wouldn't rely on the courts for help.; April 19, 2016 at 3:35 PM
Bob said...: I am not an Attorney so have no idea if my suggestion is viable or not...but here is my suggestion. It would appear that Cruz is the subject of this matter...if you have knowledge to this fact it seems to me that a Fraudulent Misrepresentation has been committed by Cruz when he stated the accusation was a complete and utter lie. Looking at the six elements that are needed to prosecute this crime it seems to me all six are met in this case. Why not simply file a suit against Cruz for Fraudulent Misrepresentation? I'm probably way off on this idea but maybe it will spark an idea in someone that knows the law. There has to be some way of alerting the public without actually opening yourself up to criminal charges.; April 21, 2016 at 11:59 AM
Anonymous said...: I cannot stand the arrogance of some Cruz supporters and their constant lies about Donald Trump. If Cruz is on that list, PLEASE make it public as soon as possible. Thank you.; April 27, 2016 at 2:32 AM
Anonymous said...: It makes me wonder since the courts have been so silent and vigilant in denying Mr. Sibley'so request regarding his First Amendment right, if the names of certain DC judges are "named" on the DC Madame's phone records. It would be a crying shame to only expose Mr. #LyinTed Cruz (note sarcasm), but other Honorary members of our prestigious courts. It appears that Judge Thomas has nothing to worry about, as he is taking this case under advisement.; April 29, 2016 at 6:52 AM
Attorney said...: Application for stay denied. Now what? http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/050216zor_j4ek.pdf; May 2, 2016 at 10:16 AM
Attorney said...: Thanks SCOTUS, so much for free speech. Gag me!; May 2, 2016 at 10:21 AM
Unknown said...: Please just make the list accessible for others to to take the responsibility for distribution.; May 2, 2016 at 4:53 PM
Anonymous said...: If someone releases a copy of the Verizon record....how could the Court ever prove who did it? Verizon employees have the records, other attorney has the record, also...records are stolen by hackers all the time. Reasonable Doubt......; May 3, 2016 at 11:20 AM

Amo Probos

Sunday, April 17, 2016

I could not have said it better myself . . .

15 comments:

Post a Comment

Previous Posts Sorted by Subject