Monday, November 23, 2015

Great Minds Think Alike

Last week, on a very rainy day, I marched down to Washington, D.C. to hand-deliver letters to Senator McConnell and Speaker Ryan.  Their attorneys had claimed that neither of them had received the letter I sent their respective offices in March 2015. As my litigation progresses against these two Congressmen, I wanted to make sure they could not claim they never knew about my demand that they are obligated to call an Article V Convention to Propose Amendments.

In the Letter I hand-delivered, I posed a question that you might find interesting:  What do Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck, George Soros, Alliance for Democracy, Center for Media and Democracy, Code Pink, Independent Progressive Politics Network, Progressive Democrats of America and the Sierra Club all agree upon? They all think it is time for a Convention to Propose Amendments as contemplated by Article V.  

Imagine that!


Tuesday, November 10, 2015

I know I can! I know I can!

Because I am the little litigation engine that could (and, unlike most, would), I must: An update on my litigation efforts:

First, in my Article V litigation against Speaker Ryan (Boehner resigned recently) and Senator McConnell, the case was remanded back to D.C. Superior Court by the U.S. District Court. Not surprisingly, Speaker Ryan has now appealed that remand to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  I have promptly moved for Summary Affirmance of the Remand Order.  In the scheme of things, this appeal will probably delay the progression of this Article V case to a decision on the merits by six (6) months or more.

Second, in my litigation against the Foreperson of the Grand Jury for Montgomery County Maryland, the State Attorney has filed their Answer Brief and I have now filed my Reply Brief.   In sum, the State Attorney argues that they should be the unaccountable gatekeeper to the Grand Jury.  I argue the opposite.  We will see if the common law prevails or the march of executive/judicial tyranny continues unabated.

Additionally, I have put in three Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth and juxtaposed them against the COLB of Mr. Obama. If the Court wants to act like ostriches and ignore the glaring anomalies in Mr. Obama's COLB, there is nothing more I can do.

Oral argument is set for the first week in February 2016, so nothing much will happen until then.


Wednesday, October 21, 2015

If it wasn't tragic, it would be funny . . .

In my Article V lawsuit against Congress, I have been emailing each member of Congress notice of the lawsuit now that it is pending in the District of Columbia Superior Court. A number of Congressional staff members have written back to me about the lawsuit and my discussions with the staffs of those Members is ongoing.

However, today I received a letter from the Attorney for the House of Representatives which is the funniest thing I have ever read.  In that letter, counsel for the House of Representatives states:

 "This Office represents House Members and staff in connection with their official activities; accordingly, to the extent you wish to communicate with any House Member or staff regarding your lawsuit, please do so through this Office. Please do not communicate directly with any House Member or staff regarding this lawsuit."  

Is an employee of Congress seeking to prevent me from petitioning members of Congress? Seriously? Perhaps its time to review the First Amendment.