Monday, April 7, 2014

Pandora's Box Has Been Opened

On March 24, 2014, Douglas Vogt’s filed his Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court which has been assigned Case No: 13-1158. That Petition sought review of the refusal of the Federal District Court to refer Vogt’s Affidavits regarding the forgery of Obama's birth certificate to a federal Grand Jury as it was required to do by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a).

Vogt has now filed in Case No.: 13-1158 a Motion to Disqualify Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor upon the grounds that their appointment to the Supreme Court was an act Barack Hussein Obama was not authorized to make as he is not a legitimate President. Accordingly, Vogt argues, neither Justice Elena Kagan nor Justice Sonia Sotomayor should decide a case which ultimately may determine whether they should remain on the Supreme Court.

In the Motion to Disqualify, Vogt further argues that not only was Obama's appointment of Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor an ultra vires act and void ab initio, but indeed, in so much as Obama did not possess the authority to sign any Congressional bills – such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – into law, issue the 172 Executive Orders he has issued, appoint any federal official nor enter into any “Treaties”, all of his acts as a putative President are void.

Needless to say, it now remains to see whether the Supreme Court will follow the Rule of Law regardless of where it takes them or whether we now have a Supreme Court which bends the Rule of Law to where they want it to go for their political ends.  The former is the hallmark of the common law upon which this Republic was formed; The latter the same tactic used by the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei starting in 1933 to make the law serve the despicable ends they sought.


Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Compelling Evidence of the Forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate Lodged with the United States Supreme Court

Douglas Vogt – with a little help from me – has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery. That forensic evidence is contained in Vogt’s 95 page Public and 75 page Sealed Affidavits. 

Barack Hussein Obama, II – at his White House Press Conference on April 27, 2011 – released that Birth Certificate to prove that he was Constitutionally-eligible to be President. The lodging of the Affidavits accompanied Vogt’s filing of a Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court which has been assigned Case No: 13-1158. That Petition seeks review of the refusal of the Federal District Court to refer Vogt’s Affidavits to a federal Grand Jury as required by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a).

Rule 6(a) states: “When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned.”  Vogt’s Petition argues that there can be no higher “public interest” than the issue of whether Barack Hussein Obama, II, has foisted a forged Birth Certificate upon the Citizens of the United States. Accordingly, the Petition argues, the lower federal court has breached its Congressionally-imposed duty to “summon” a Grand Jury to hear Vogt’s well-founded, forensic proof of the forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate.

At its core, the Petition raises the important issue of who can seek invocation of the Grand Jury’s Constitutionally-unique investigative power. As well documented by Justice Scalia and others of the Supreme Court, originally that right to communicate to the Grand Jury could be invoked by anyone so that the Grand Jury could investigate any matter: “no matter how or by whom suggested to them.” Yet, as recognized by Justice Douglas in United States v. Dioniso, it is: “common knowledge that the Grand Jury, having been conceived as a bulwark between the citizen and the Government, is now a tool of the Executive.”

The question is really quite simple. Does a citizen have the right to put proof of a crime before the Grand Jury?  In this case, the forensic proof of the forgery of Obama's Birth Certificate.  Then, if the Grand Jury thinks it is warranted, they can, by issuing a few documentary subpoenas, quickly answer the question We the People have a right to know:

Is the office of the President being held by one who is not Constitutionally-eligible to hold that office and who may not even be a U.S. citizen?
If the answer proves Vogt's allegations are correct, the results would be staggering in their implications.  This well-deserved answer can be had at the small cost of documentary subpoenas upon: (i) the Hawaiian Department of Health (ii) Occidental College, (iii) Columbia University, (iv) Harvard Law School, (v) the Social Security Administration, (vi) U.S. Center for Disease Control, Department of Vital Statistics, (vii) the Selective Service Administration and (viii) the Law Firm of Perkins Coie to produce their records regarding Obama.

Through such subpoenas, this important question will be answered once and for all: 

Is Obama really who he says he is?


Friday, March 7, 2014

Six Minutes, Fifty Two Seconds Well Spent

As we all wait for the other shoe to drop as the Grand Jury finishes its concealed-from-public-view investigation of the legitimacy of Mr. Obama’s occupation of the Office of the President, I thought a personal point of pride – and a great way to spend six minutes, fifty-two seconds – was in order. My son has made a short film which was a finalist in the recent D.C. International Film Festival.  I hope you enjoy it:

By the way, you can also support his next film: Cellmate.