-->

Sunday, April 17, 2016

I could not have said it better myself . . .


The Post & Email






16 comments:

Anonymous said...

By the the most recent "Last great day" of April 29th occurs significant primary elections of New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Maryland, Delaware, and Rhode Island will have occurred.
I feel the clock is being run out on you and that the conference date will only result in a further delay most probably until after June 7th when the last significant number of primaries occur.
The stated reason for wanting the order lifted in your words is that it “deprives the People of the information they may deem material to the exercise of their electoral franchise”
How strong is that argument when for all practical purposes the people have made their decision at the polls on who will represent their party?
That may well be the argument as to why the court would no longer feel compelled to lift the order.
You weren't required to take a "second bite of the apple", the court had spoken. You can withdraw the request.
Some soul searching is in order if you are sincere in arming the voters with what you say may be important information in a timely manner.
I don't envy your position.
Good luck to you.




Although your "second bite of the apple" was your request

Kari Gresh said...

So most likely there will be a stalemate....then what? Will you release??

Anonymous said...

The stalling is predictable. When they finally make their decision, it won't really matter any longer.

Anonymous said...

Attorney Sibley: If you do not want to release the name of the person who you say would impact the Presidential race- and we all assume it is Ted Cruz- then why don't we do this: If you DON'T print anything specifically on who it is, via Amo Probos by NOON April 18, 2016,then we can all assume that it IS Ted Cruz on the DC Madam's list of clients that you have. OK? That way you are not releasing any names. Your silence will be assent to the foregoing understanding. Thank you for your attention!

Rocket Dogs said...

Shyster cuck.

Tamara Thibodeaux said...

Cruz is on the list...Ashley Madison as well!

Casey said...

Great idea!

Kari Gresh said...

April 29 is too late. Elections will have occurred. Courts will not lift order, just a waste of time. You either release or not, but I wouldn't rely on the courts for help.

Bob said...

I am not an Attorney so have no idea if my suggestion is viable or not...but here is my suggestion. It would appear that Cruz is the subject of this matter...if you have knowledge to this fact it seems to me that a Fraudulent Misrepresentation has been committed by Cruz when he stated the accusation was a complete and utter lie. Looking at the six elements that are needed to prosecute this crime it seems to me all six are met in this case. Why not simply file a suit against Cruz for Fraudulent Misrepresentation? I'm probably way off on this idea but maybe it will spark an idea in someone that knows the law. There has to be some way of alerting the public without actually opening yourself up to criminal charges.

Anonymous said...

I cannot stand the arrogance of some Cruz supporters and their constant lies about Donald Trump. If Cruz is on that list, PLEASE make it public as soon as possible. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

It makes me wonder since the courts have been so silent and vigilant in denying Mr. Sibley'so request regarding his First Amendment right, if the names of certain DC judges are "named" on the DC Madame's phone records. It would be a crying shame to only expose Mr. #LyinTed Cruz (note sarcasm), but other Honorary members of our prestigious courts. It appears that Judge Thomas has nothing to worry about, as he is taking this case under advisement.

Attorney said...

In just hours before SCOTUS reveals decision about releasing names, after reading excerpts from City of Charles v Kanawha Players, Justice Ginsberg and Thomas strongly defended free speech. Hope that guides them in this important decision. Ginsberg said "In short, freedom of speech means the freedom of fucking speech, you ignorant cocksuckers." Damn I wish she would visit liberal college campuses.

Attorney said...

Application for stay denied. Now what? http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/050216zor_j4ek.pdf

Attorney said...

Thanks SCOTUS, so much for free speech. Gag me!

Carol Lloyd said...

Please just make the list accessible for others to to take the responsibility for distribution.

Anonymous said...

If someone releases a copy of the Verizon record....how could the Court ever prove who did it? Verizon employees have the records, other attorney has the record, also...records are stolen by hackers all the time. Reasonable Doubt......

Post a Comment

Play nice!