If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck . . .

As most informed people know, on Monday, Sen. Pat Toomey and Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick held a news conference in Philadelphia. The news conference was held to express opposition to President Barack Obama's nomination of lawyer Debo Adegbile to serve as the U.S. Department of Justice's assistant attorney general for civil rights. Adegbile had done work with the NAACP on behalf of convicted Philadelphia cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jama.

In response, I have sent a letter to Congressmen Toomey and Fitzpatrick detailing the link between cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jama and Eric Holder.  In that letter, after I detail a factual connection between Abu-Jamal, Holder, Obama and Elizabeth Duke, I conclude as follows:

Plainly, there is an on-going effort by the Obama administration to advance a very radical agenda by appointing Debo Adegbile to the powerful office of civil rights.  Coupled with Obama’s above-described de facto pardon of Elizabeth Duke who was connected with Abu-Jama’s Philadelphia Black Panther party’s operations, I think the old adage “that if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and looks like a duck it is a duck” is applicable here.  Something is rotten in Philadelphia and I possess information that I believe connects Abu-Jama with Barack Obama and Eric Holder through Elizabeth Duke.

As I am sure you recall, now-Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. repeatedly pushed some of his subordinates at the Clinton Justice Department to drop their opposition to a controversial 1999 grant of clemency to 16 members of two violent Puerto Rican nationalist organizations, FALN (the Spanish acronym for Armed Forces of National Liberation) and Los Macheteros. Those organizations had been involved in a bombing campaign in New York, Chicago and elsewhere in the 1970s and 1980s.  Not surprising, as, among other actions, Holder: (i) participated as a freshman at Columbia University in 1970 in a five-day “armed” occupation of an abandoned Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) headquarters with the university’s Black Students’ Organization and (ii) refused to prosecute the notorious 2008 New Black Panther voter intimidation case, in, of course, Philadelphia.

The questions these facts raise demand Congressional inquiry.  In particular:

1. Why is the Obama administration secretly and improperly dismissing charges against a domestic terrorist who bombed your own “house”;

2. Why is the judiciary so compliant – and indeed engaging in classic felonious cover-up behavior – to this soto voce plan of the Department of Justice to put radical anti-American persons and policies in place?

3. Why have my repeated requests to present evidence – and please note that I was the attorney for the so-called D.C. Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey and am under a judicial gag order regarding information from her client records – to the grand jury for their consideration and, if warranted, investigation been blocked by Eric Holder and the Judiciary?

I am just asking.