Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Obama Dismisses Indictment Against Fugitive Bombing Terrorist - Part VI

On October 11, 2013, the Supreme Court took up my Motion to Direct their Clerk to file my Petition for Certiorari in which I sought to bring the evidence of significant judicial misconduct by Magistrate Judge Robinson – if not felonious behavior – before them.  I took this extraordinary step as Magistrate Judge Robinson’s immediate supervisors – the fifteen judges of the D.C. District Court – refused to take any such action.

By Letter dated October 15, 2013, the Clerk notified me that the Court had “denied” without explanation my motion.  By so doing, the Court was holding that I had no right to “petition” to bring such allegations before them.   I employ the word “petition” for good reason as all know that the First Amendment is explicit in securing to the People the right: “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Accordingly, I have filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification in which I ask the Court to clarify upon what authority they are denying me the right to Petition them for redress of my grievances.  But there is more, much more:

In that same pleading I detail publically that which I was loathed to do and thus sought to file the following allegations under seal.  Simply stated, it appears that Magistrate Judge Robinson – under threat that her son could be committed to Maryland State Prison where the threat of violence is much higher than in the federal system and knowing her son was facing 40 years in prison – caved to the Obama Administration’s peculiar demand to dismiss an indictment against the fugitive, domestic terrorist, Capitol-bombing Elizabeth Duke made without explanation by granting that motion and then signing the order impersonating an Article III judge. In return, her son received the velvet glove treatment from the federal government.

Additionally, I have sent this now public allegation by Letter to the fifteen judges of the D.C. District Court to see if they will address this apparent perversion of the federal criminal justice system for reasons I know, but have yet to make public.

Time will tell, but I won't wait long and I do have at least one more trick up my sleeve . . .


Marc Smith said...

Supreme court judges might as well be living in an iron lung. The clerks breathe for them, run for them, think for them and probably write for them. Just like those monkeys, I guess.

Anonymous said...

I find the possibility of Robinson being extorted real, but I suspect the fact that she and Eric Holder were appointed to the DC courts in the same year (1988) and that they must have known each other to be the likely setup for a scratch my back and I'll scratch yours situation. Certainty they could have had a friendly lunch and discussed each others “needs.” Note also Eric Holder was involved in the scandal back when he recommended pardons for some of Duke's buds under Clinton's administration.
Note Holder was appointed by Regan in 88 as an associate justice. QUESTION: given your insight/knowledge of the DC courts, were they in the same courthouse? Adjoining offices? Just curious.

Post a Comment

Play nice!