-->

Monday, April 11, 2016

Can you hear me now?


I have waited long enough for the basic right to be heard in a timely fashion. Former Chief U.S. District Court Judge Roberts would not let me file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Orders. Recently nominated-to-the -U.S.-Supreme-Court Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland has tied up my Emergency Petition in the Circuit Court of Appeals for over thirty (30) days without addressing the merits.  Chief Justice Roberts has denied my Application

But then a funny thing happened.

Back in February I had filed a lawsuit against Former Judge Roberts and the Clerk of the District Court in D.C. Superior Court -- the "state" court for the District of Columbia.  Last week, the U.S. Attorney in her infinite wisdom removed that case to U.S. District Court which left me one last federal judicial opening.

So today I  jumped through that opening and filed with U.S. District Court Judge Walton both my First Amended Complaint and "Emergency Motion for Pre-trial Conference to Schedule Expedited Disposition of Sibley’s Third Claim". 

Exhibit "B" to that Emergency Motion lists the names of some 174 companies and government agencies whose cellphone numbers appear in the Verizon Wireless subpoena return that I have in my possession.  Before you rush to Exhibit "B", I would hope you would take a moment to read the seven (7) page Emergency Motion in its entirety so you can put my actions in releasing this information in the context I intend them.

And no, I am not releasing any individual names  . . . yet.

12 comments:

Tom Kawczynski said...

Thanks for following through with this. How long do you presume is a reasonable time for Judge Walton to act upon your Emergency Motion?

Ronel de klerk said...

why do you not want to release individual names?

Gayle Hedrington said...

Been reading your older posts and listening to audio clips. I pray you do well in your journey.You are an honorable man.

Triquetra 331 said...

Funny how Judge Garland is Obama's new Supreme Court nominee...

Triquetra 331 said...

He wants to, but he is under s restraining order. He wants to exhaust all legal options to release the names freely, without chance of legal reprisals. If he is blocked at every turn, and is given no legal avenue to release, then he will (hopefully) go public.

At this point, the courts are stonewalling him. So, when he does release the info, he can confidently say that he followed the law to find a way to release info pertinent (he says) to the current Presidential campaign. But the courts, so far, are not even allowing him to even file for a legal hearing. If/when he exhausts all possible legal avenues to make his info public and they continue blocking him at every turn, he will have a very good legal argument in case TPTB try to have him charged with contempt of court (and/or other charges) for releasing info that is held secret under a restraining order.
They won't even let him ask for permission to release the info, that's the issue.

SuppressedLiberty said...

"Clear to me is that “those sacred rights” are being stripped from us daily and hence I have been called by ancient voices to “assert the liberty” of this Country for my children's sake." Your words Mr. Sibley, are you going to stand by them????

Anonymous said...

release them all
the country is dying

Ronel de klerk said...

Thank you for your reply. Everything reeks of corruption!!
I wish Mr. sibley has something on Cruz, I would like to see the smirk disappear off his hateful face.

Trump2016 said...

Cruz is on the List. Ashley Madison as well.

Anonymous said...

Is there any way to obtain the other records which were made inaccessible due to Judge Robertson's quash? As you said, if these records are only 13% of those initially requested by subpoena, then there are a lot of folks out there Judge Robertson let off the hook. I imagine since those records are not relevant to any open case, then there is no legal justification in the court's view to obtain them now. That is unfortunate.

Attorney said...

Yes, I can hear you now...

Not sure the Political Insider heard you accurately. Heading is "DC Madam's Attorney is NAMING NAMES... and a Presidential Candidate is 'ON THE LIST'".

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/confirmed-dc-madams-attorney-naming-names-presidential-candidate-list/

But they quoted it accurately in the article: information is "relevant to the upcoming presidential election."

Maybe the assumption of the headline is close enough. To be continued ...

CarolinaGirl217 said...

Maybe the Great Judge Robert's and Judge Garland's name is on the list.

Post a Comment

Play nice!