-->

Monday, March 28, 2016

And now to the Supreme Court . . .

After waiting for two weeks for the U.S. Circuit Court to rule upon my Petition to (i) order the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order that prevents me from releasing the D.C. Madam's client list and (ii) direct that I receive an expedited hearing on that Motion, I am -- as I previously announced -- waiting no more.

Today I have filed at the U.S. Supreme Court my Application for a Stay of Restraining Order directed to the Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. , Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Notably, in that Application, I unequivocally stated the following:
To be clear, if Sibley is not allowed to file his Motion to Modify the Restraining Order and thereafter does not promptly receive a fair and impartial hearing on that Motion, he will justifiably consider the Restraining Order void as a result of being denied such a hearing by the District Court, Circuit Court and now this Court. In that event, Sibley will simply release publicly the Verizon Wireless Subpoena Return records containing the names and addresses of eight hundred fifteen (815) Washington D.C. clients of the D.C. Madam’s escort service.
Not a threat, but a promise.  And, to date, I have been a man of my word.

11 comments:

Vicky Gallas said...

Love it Montgomery! They have no right to stop the release of these records. Who specifically are they protecting? Well, I guess we shall find out!

Unknown said...

Mr. Sibley you are the modern day Bob Woodward & Archibald Cox combined. Take that to the bank. Save our Democracy from the death grip of sexually immoral politicians, thumping bible to rip off voters.

Anonymous said...

Mr Sibley, I have read much about your work and your career, you are a true patriot unfairly marginalized by a corrupt system. If the records you hold are indeed a relevant piece of evidence to impact the decisions of American voters, I am confident you will do the right thing by releasing them, regardless of the court's decision or indecision. As many enemies as you stand to make, I guarantee you will gain as many friends and will stand alone as a champion of truth.

Unknown said...

Please can you release the record before Tuesdays WI primary?. Voters deserve the truth. Americans are all behind you

Democracy! said...

Time is absolutely of the essence. Releasing these the sooner the better cannot do harm to our democracy. With only 943 delegates remaining in the primary, each day could be a day too late!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

If the hearing for your motion is not heard BEFORE April 19 (date of NY primary), will you release all your information to the public?

Please let us know your next move so we're not waiting on pins and needles as it's highly likely the Supreme Court might not give you a hearing for months -- a move the puppet masters want.

Anonymous said...

Nope, Supreme Court denied a hearing of the case. Now the ball is in your court to release and face the consequences of the lower court.

Unknown said...

are you the only one the court order prohibits from releasing the info? Like can someone else not involved release it? ?

IRS Revealed MONEY for SEX said...

Public record paid for by taxpayers. Land of BRAVES not cowards with PIMPING TRASH. We the People have the RIGHTS to know WHO is shadowing us. Time to release the PRIDE of shadowers.

Anonymous said...

Ted Cruz to make major announcement at 4 p.m. I think you should make your major announcement as well.

Post a Comment

Play nice!