-->

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Compelling Evidence of the Forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate Lodged with the United States Supreme Court

Douglas Vogt – with a little help from me – has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery. That forensic evidence is contained in Vogt’s 95 page Public and 75 page Sealed Affidavits. 

Barack Hussein Obama, II – at his White House Press Conference on April 27, 2011 – released that Birth Certificate to prove that he was Constitutionally-eligible to be President. The lodging of the Affidavits accompanied Vogt’s filing of a Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court which has been assigned Case No: 13-1158. That Petition seeks review of the refusal of the Federal District Court to refer Vogt’s Affidavits to a federal Grand Jury as required by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a).

Rule 6(a) states: “When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned.”  Vogt’s Petition argues that there can be no higher “public interest” than the issue of whether Barack Hussein Obama, II, has foisted a forged Birth Certificate upon the Citizens of the United States. Accordingly, the Petition argues, the lower federal court has breached its Congressionally-imposed duty to “summon” a Grand Jury to hear Vogt’s well-founded, forensic proof of the forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate.

At its core, the Petition raises the important issue of who can seek invocation of the Grand Jury’s Constitutionally-unique investigative power. As well documented by Justice Scalia and others of the Supreme Court, originally that right to communicate to the Grand Jury could be invoked by anyone so that the Grand Jury could investigate any matter: “no matter how or by whom suggested to them.” Yet, as recognized by Justice Douglas in United States v. Dioniso, it is: “common knowledge that the Grand Jury, having been conceived as a bulwark between the citizen and the Government, is now a tool of the Executive.”

The question is really quite simple. Does a citizen have the right to put proof of a crime before the Grand Jury?  In this case, the forensic proof of the forgery of Obama's Birth Certificate.  Then, if the Grand Jury thinks it is warranted, they can, by issuing a few documentary subpoenas, quickly answer the question We the People have a right to know:
Is the office of the President being held by one who is not Constitutionally-eligible to hold that office and who may not even be a U.S. citizen?
If the answer proves Vogt's allegations are correct, the results would be staggering in their implications.  This well-deserved answer can be had at the small cost of documentary subpoenas upon: (i) the Hawaiian Department of Health (ii) Occidental College, (iii) Columbia University, (iv) Harvard Law School, (v) the Social Security Administration, (vi) U.S. Center for Disease Control, Department of Vital Statistics, (vii) the Selective Service Administration and (viii) the Law Firm of Perkins Coie to produce their records regarding Obama.

Through such subpoenas, this important question will be answered once and for all: 

Is Obama really who he says he is?

24 comments:

smrstrauss said...

Douglas Vogt is a nut who has claimed on his website that he discovered "the original Altar of Abraham." (Want to see the link?)

And, Douglas Vogt, like the other birthers is lying in his claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged. Birthers have lied and lied and lied.

More examples of classic birther lies:

(1) Birthers said that Obama's draft card was forged, and indeed it was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama---so who do you think forged it? (Okay, I'll make it easy---the guy who posted it.)

(2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia---but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check?

(3) Birthers said that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya---but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII---why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said "born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time." Why do you suppose they did that?

(4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

smrstrauss said...

Continuing:


(5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

(6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961---or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

(7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said "I was born in Kenya"---but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say "I was born in Kenya.."" Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged "Kenyan birth certificates." And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

(8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama's BC---when there weren't ANY???

(9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

And (10) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”---are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

In short, it is just another birther LIE.

Martha Trowbridge said...

Thank you, "smrstrauss", for your effusive outpouring of what The "Obama" Conspirators foolishly [still] regard as effective weaponry against Truth. Time for you to consult Bullock, p. 778, describing Adolf aka Hitler's mental state in April 1945:

"Hitler had lost all control over events, and by April he had the greatest difficulty in discovering what was happening."

smrstrauss said...

Notice that Martha Trowbridge has not responded to the facts shown above? (I wonder why not???)

Barkahn said...

smrstrauss: Assertions are not facts. Meanwhile., the hole you have dug, and at the bottom of which you are standing, is of record depth. how do you propose to climb out?

smrstrauss said...

Re: "Assertions are not facts. "

Answer: I am delighted to show links that confirm the facts.

Here is a link to many (though far from all) of the documents that confirm that Hawaii sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that all the facts on the copies published are exactly the same as on what they sent to him:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/

That shows the short-form official birth certificate, the Certification of Live Birth in detail. It also shows several confirmations that you should check including two that say that the facts on the published BC MATCH the facts on the ones sent to him.

smrstrauss said...

Continuing:

Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-obama-hawaii_N.htm

Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and
that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice.

And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html

Here is the statement of the teacher who recalls being told of the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961, and that she wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after hearing it:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://mysite.ncnetwork.net/res10o2yg/obama/Teacher%20from%20Kenmore%20recalls%20Obama%20was%20a%20focused%20student%20%20Don%27t%20Miss%20%20The%20Buffalo%20News.htm


Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php

(And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

Here is the Index Data file:

http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04/in_hawaii_its_easy_to_get_birt.html

Re allegations of forgery. It turns out that ONLY birther "experts"---who have not shown that they are even experts, and who CERTAINLY have not shown that they are fair and impartial---have CLAIMED that there is anything wrong with Obama's birth certificate, and birther sites have not quoted the numerous real experts who say that there is nothing wrong with it. Besides, for the claim that the birth certificate being forged to have any effect, it would have had to have been forged and inserted into the Hawaii DOH files, because that is where the officials of both parties have stated that they saw it (and that document is the one that the clerk in Hawaii used to enter the facts on the form that generated the short-form birth certificate), and what are the chances of that happening? Besides, even that would not account for the teacher who wrote home or the birth notices sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.

Oh, and there is this little factor, that Hawaii is THOUSANDS of miles away from the nearest foreign country and that women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days. Oh, and by the way, Kaiploani Hospital is confirming that Obama was born there (want to see the two citations of that?) and Obama's Kenyan grandmother NEVER said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii and she said in another interview that the first that her family had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter from Hawaii (want to see the citation for that too?)

Anonymous said...

Sibley should know this is doomed: He made the exact same argument last year, and lost:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-736.htm

Anonymous said...

Here is Vogt's pathetic affidavit eviscerated in detail. Enjoy.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/194384601/20-Shades-of-Vogt

Patrick McKinnion said...

Well, to be fair, this may be just as accurate as Douglas Vogt's book "Reality Revealed"

http://www.vectorpub.com/Reality_Revealed.html

"This historically important philosophy of science books is the first in history to theorize the Universe is the product of information. The first information theory of existence. explains many of the hardest phenomena in the Universe such as: the causes of the ice ages, polar reversals, mass extinctions, gravity, light, pyramid energy, kirlian photography, psychic phenomena, and more. the Table of Contents is listed below. We offer free downloads in text format of the whole book.
The first information theory of existence. explains many of the hardest phenomena in the Universe such as: the causes of the ice ages, polar reversals, mass extinctions, gravity, light, pyramid energy, kirlian photography, psychic phenomena, and more!"

Or his book "Gravitational Mystery Spots of The United States"

http://www.vectorpub.com/Gravitational_Mystery_Spot.html

"Gravitational Mystery Spots of the United States is the first book that scientifically explains the gravitational anomalies found in the United States. The book does this by using the authors Theory of Multidimensional Reality. An Information Theory of Existence.
This historically important book explains why people and objects get smaller as they approach the center of these vortexes. Find out why it takes greater force to push a weight towards the center of the vortex than away. Find out why trees bend inside the vortex. The author did time experiments in these gravitational anomalies and found that time sped up and sometimes slowed down. The “flow” of time was changing dynamically over time!"

Or even his book "God's Day of Judgment, The Real Cause of Global Warming"

http://www.vectorpub.com/Gods_Day_of_judgment.html

"The author proves that there is a very high probability the next polar reversal will happen between September and December 2046. He found the exact date encoded in the Torah. In addition, he discovered the exact number of years between polar reversals, which is 12,068 years. The Torah has this same number encoded in its text.

The author explains how the Ark, the Tabernacle and the Rod of God worked and shows pictures of many of the altars he discovered during his two expeditions to the Sinai, Egypt.

The reason why the book includes both religious as well as hard science subjects is because of what the author had discovered. One of his most proud discoveries is to discover the model that created the original 22-Hebrew letters. Normally you would not think this would be a major scientific discovery but it was. The original Hebrew alphabet is 22 views of a waveform that is a modified square wave superimposed on a toroid "

After all, this is the same Douglas Vogt who described himself as:

"Douglas Vogt is an amature geologist and science philosopher and writer. He has funded and directed three expeditions to the Sinai desert where he was the first person since Baruch (Jeremiah’s grandson) to discover the real Mount Sinai. He discovered all the altars that Moses described in the Torah. In addition he was the first person since Moses to see the real Abraham’s altar also located at Mount Sinai and not in Jerusalem. He has discovered the code systems used by Moses when writing the surface story of the Torah, which enabled him to decode the Torah and other earlier books of the Hebrew Scriptures."

With a background like that, one just might, might mind you, start to think that his "research" might just be a bit on the questionable side. Unless you believe stuff like "Chariots of the Gods" and the like.

Barkahn said...

smrstrauss is an encyclopedic source of disinformation and misinformation. Moreover, Doug Vogt is far more likely to have discovered the "original alter of Abraham" than Obama is to have discovered and posted his genuine long form birth certificate. There's a limit to the height credulity for those with a grasp of reality--however tenuous-with which smrstrauss in not burdened.

Vogtland said...

Answers to the paid obots smrstrauss (to scared to show us his/her real name meaning they lie professionally) and Patrick McKinnion a very un-erudite and pompous obot who thinks he knows everything and how dare anyone challenge him. I want everyone to notice that both do NOT try to disprove anything that is in my 95 page affidavit—because they cannot and they know it.
To smrstrauss most if not all of what you wrote is a pack of lies or half-truths. For instance two Kenyan MKs, in the parliament at two different times, said that Obama was born in Kenya. I have their official record to prove it. Tim Adams in his affidavit said that all the hospitals and the Hawaiian DOH in 2008 said they had no record of Obama’s birth. There is much more but why go into all of it because after all these obots are paid to answer any news that contradicts the official communist line from the White House.
To Patrick, I want to thank you for publicizing my three books. If you think I didn’t discover the real Mount Sinai or Abrahams’ alter then buy the book and see the proof. Your problem is that you think you are smarter than everyone else. When you see someone who writes they are smarter than you, you get jealous. If you think you are so smart than why are you supporting Obama the Marxist? Why are you a socialist? Don’t you know that socialism is nothing more than a redoing of feudalism; it just has more layers of bureaucracy. So ask yourself why do you want to become a property of the state. Why do you think big government knows how to spend you money better than you?

Anonymous said...

"I want everyone to notice that both do NOT try to disprove anything that is in my 95 page affidavit—because they cannot and they know it. "

That's not true. Your affidavit was completely refuted here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/194384601/20-Shades-of-Vogt

It so completely destroys your affidavit that's why you refuse to acknowledge it.

Robert Laity said...

Prior to 1946 Citizen "Presentment" Grand Juries were in ubiquitous usage. In 1946 errant rule makers of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure referring to these 5th Amendment authorized forums as "Obsolete" unconstitutionally did away with them. The right still remains since rules do NOT supersede the Constitution. We need only to dust it off and use it. "There can be NO rule making or legislation that would abrogate a right guaranteed by the Constitution"-Miranda v Arizona,SCOTUS.

smrstrauss said...

Re: "To smrstrauss most if not all of what you wrote is a pack of lies or half-truths. For instance two Kenyan MKs, in the parliament at two different times, said that Obama was born in Kenya. I have their official record to prove it."

Answer: Two Kenyan members of parliament can be WRONG and in fact stupidly wrong----just like two, and more than two, members of the US Congress. The two, like a few gullible folks in this country, believe the birther LIES.

But it is virtually impossible for Obama to have been born in Kenya---or for that matter any other place than in Hawaii. And sensible people realize it.

First, let's take up the nuttiest claim, that Obama was born in Kenya---which, as you pointed out, some members of the Kenyan Parliament think is true. But it would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to happen because:

(1) ONLY 21 people came to the USA from Kenya TOTAL in 1961, and of them only one person came by air---all the others came by sea, and there were no regularly scheduled ships from Kenya to Hawaii in 1961. (Want to see the US Immigration and Naturalization Service report for 1961?????)

(2) For Obama to have been born in Kenya his mother would have had to have GONE from Hawaii to Kenya, and she would have had to have done it ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout the year [Davis, of course, would not have even been interested in going to Kenya since he had no relatives there]. And she would have had to have gone to Kenya by ship, since ALL 53 people who went to Kenya went by ship. And she would have had to have taken that long and expensive trip at the risk of stillbirth---which was fairly common in 1961 (which is why EXTREMELY few women traveled late in pregnancy). Yet birthers have convinced a few HIGHLY GULLIBLE people to assume that she was one of the extremely few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy.

(3) IF she had taken that trip and given birth in Kenya, she would have had to have gotten her child from Kenya to Hawaii, and to do so without any record of his being entered on her passport or getting a US visa, she would have had to have successfully SMUGGLED him because we don't just allow infants to be carried into the country you know. They require being entered on US passports or visas----and if either of those had been applied for in any foreign country the Bush Administration would have found that application years and years ago. (Are you saying that the Bush Administration were part of the plot????)

(4) And, in addition to all those three highly unlikely things happening, Obama's relatives would have had to have convinced the DOH of Hawaii (which was under a Republican governor in 1961) to issue a birth certificate for Obama that said that he was born in Kapiolani Hospital---which BTW, Kapiolani has now confirmed twice (but naturally birther sites did not show their readers either of them). We KNOW that Hawaii did issue a birth certificate for Obama in 1961 because of the birth notices sent to the "Health Bureau Statistics" sections of the Hawaii newspapers, which only the Health Bureau---the DOH----could send birth notices to, and in 1961 it only sent out birth notices for children born in Hawaii. And in 1961 Hawaii law did not allow the DOH to issue a birth certificate to a child that was not born in Hawaii---and the law certainly never allowed the DOH to issue a BC that says "born in Kapiolani Hospital" unless there was evidence that the child was born in Kapiolani Hospital.

And, the Kenyan government has said that it checked, and that Obama was not born there. (That was after the two members of parliament made their stupid statements.) Here it is:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiol …

smrstrauss said...

Now taking up the "born in a foreign country" myth in general:


For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

(1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

(2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

(3) Obama’s relative would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).

If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.

So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

(Oh, and there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying. )


Anonymous said...

After reading "20 Shades of Vogt" the question is were copies of it sent to the same judges that Vogt sent his affidavit? That would explain why they ignored Vogt's affidavit. And since Vogt has never responded to the findings in 20 Shades, the judges would have to assume they are true.

Has 20 Shades been sent to Supreme Court justices? Maybe Vogt needs to file a response to it so the justices don't have to assume it is true.

Anonymous said...

Vogt thinks he is so much smarter than everyone else. However, I predict:

1. The U.S. Supreme Court will deny his petition, without comment; and
2. Vogt will cite this event as proof that the judiciary is corrupt.

If Vogt was as half as smart as he thinks he is, he would acknowledge that the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of his petition means he's wrong.

Anonymous said...

Let's not forget what actually testified under oath in Georgia:

" Yes, the haloing we’re referring to is around all the type and lines, there’s a white line. At first, we didn’t quite know what it was until we finally actually replicated the form and actually redid the thing and figured out how the forger did it.

The haloing is caused by what — it’s a subroutine in Photoshop called unsharp mask. Now you have to understand, if a document like this has any evidence of computer manipulation, it’s a fraud."

There is of course exactly zero, no, nada evidence that Photoshop ever touched the LFBC. RC at the RC Radio Blog has also conclusively shown that a Xerox WorkCentre will produce similar halos when a similar document is scanned to PDF.

Administrative Law Judge Malihi found no value at all in Vogt's testimony in Georgia and that was in an administrative hearing without the opposition even showing up to question Vogt's lack of credentials. Vogt would never be allowed as an expert witness in any venue where he would have to pass vetting as an expert.

Vogt has deluded himself into believing the has cracked the crime of the century and the courts should let him play Perry Mason in front of a grand jury. It will not happen. The courts will not entertain the delusions of old fools.

Patrick McKinnion said...

There is a certain amount of irony in Douglas Vogt calling me a "...pompous obot who thinks he knows everything and how dare anyone challenge him", and then following it with several paragraphs that end up as a textbook example of the concept of "Psychological Projection".

As a capstone to this projection, he uses the line "Your problem is that you think you are smarter than everyone else." Which is rather hysterical because that's actually what Vogt is doing in his so-called "analysis", not to mention his books.

Stamping one's feet 12,068 times and going "I'm right because I say I'm right and you're wrong because I'm right so there!" doesn't make you automatically right. If your claim is invalid or incorrect to begin with, you can waste 12,068 pages of paper trying to prove it, and it's going to be just as invalid as when you started.

Oh, and to correct your belief, I am not nor ever have been a socialist. I'm a former Libertarian and a current moderate with a strong belief in personal and social liberty, including support of the 1st and 2nd Amendments. But if it makes it easier for you to make blanket assumptions of your critics, that's your issue, not mine.

As for your case, the claims you've made have been repeatedly refuted, and I see no reason why the Supreme Court won't dismiss it like they have every other birther case. You can submit the same case 12,068 times, and you're more than likely going to get the same result.

Patrick McKinnion said...

While I'm sure there are at least 12,068 flaws in Douglas Vogt's reasoning and theories, one of the overall problems I see is that of Confirmation Bias.

If you investigate something already confident what the answer will be, the tendency is to ignore data or evidence that fails to confirm that belief.

We see this in his book "Reality Revealed", where Vogt ties together a wide range of topics in an attempt to create a unifying "Information-based" theory to explain the concept of reality.

"God's Day of Judgement" is more of the same. Having crunched some numbers to find the location of what Vogt believes to be the "real Mt. Sinai", (as seen though the filter of his "information theory of reality), he then went to the site already knowing what he thought he would find. As such, his mind was already set up to see any hillock as a mountain, with any vaguely-squared off rock as an altar and table, with a random assortment of pre-and-post historical pottery shards as evidence.

Which leads to the second part of Vogt's problem - arrogance. He describes his books as "historically important", everything is seen though his "information-based reality" filter, and claims that he's decoded information in the Bible and Torah that amazingly enough, nobody else has been able to figure out.

Which leads to his "analysis" about the long-form birth certificate. Just as he used his pet theory to "decode" hidden messages in the Torah, he uses his own bias against President Obama to "decode" the long form, and sees things that - amazingly enough - nobody else has managed to find.

He's not alone in such though. Ron Polland / Polarik got so wrapped up in his pet theories that he started to claim that any evidence that disproved his claims about President Obama's COLB was forged as well. Mara Zebest was claiming forgery long before the long form was released. Paul Irey claimed the long form was a forgery before he ever saw it, based on a supposed claim from an anonymous Secret Service agent that only Paul was told about.

In all those cases, we have "experts" that claim special knowledge known only to them, pet theories that don't hold up to critical analysis, and a scoffing scorn or downright hatred shown anyone who dares to disagree with them.

Like all the other supposed "experts", Douglas Vogt went into his "analysis" of the long form already convinced it was a forgery. And just like his theories on reality, Mt. Sinai, and Mystery Spots, he's unwilling or unable to look at any thing that would disprove his pet theory. The problem comes that to anyone not blinded by bias, reading between the lines 12,068 times still won’t make something real or accurate or true.

Anonymous said...

Vogt's insistence on the importance of his errant crackpottery is particularly amusing. The "publisher's note" on his silly "God's Day of Judgment" asserts that "He developed this philosophy in 1977 and it will eventually have a profound effect on all the fields of science." That was more than 35 years ago. Science has advanced remarkably since then. And his idiotic "Information Theory of Reality" contributed exactly nothing to that advancement. It has been relegated to the trash heap of discredited scientific nonsense along with orgone energy, phlogiston and the luminiferous aether.

So too with amateurish excursions in into the already tendentious "field" of Biblical archeology. Vogt's claims of earthshaking discovery have shaken nothing. No actual Biblical Archeologist accepts his claims as anything other than meretricious babble.

As "20 Shades of Vogt" concludes after considering his "credentials":

"There can be little doubt Vogt considers himself a member of that small club of brilliant thinkers who were ignored or reviled in their own time. But as Carl Sagan wrote, '(T)he fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.'”

bantal silikon said...

this is good post...

i like this...

please can you visit here..

http://bantalsilikon01.blogspot.com/
http://bantalsilikon01.blogdetik.com/
http://bantalkekabumurah.blogspot.com/
http://bumbupecel1.blogspot.com/
http://bantalgood.blogspot.com/
http://bantalsilikonmalang1.blogspot.com/
http://bantalsilikonmurah.blogspot.com/

http://marinirseo.blogspot.com/
http://marinirseo.blogspot.com/
http://marinirseo.blogspot.com/


tengs very much...

smrstrauss said...

More than six months have passed since this article was posted and the Supreme Court did not take the case, and Obama is still the President, and no member of Congress has even called for an investigation of Obama's birth certificate or his place of birth.

Post a Comment

Play nice!