Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Sibley v. Obama -- the Courts stall the litigation

I haven’t updated my litigation efforts which seek to challenge the eligibility of Mr. Obama to be President as for almost two months the Courts have refused to move the lawsuits forward.  However, I am still marching to the beat of that distant drum.  Here is the present status of my efforts:

First, in February I released my Nyguen Motion to the federal prisoner population.  The Nyguen Motion argues that: (i) Article II, Section 2, clause 2 grants the President the power to “appoint” federal judges, (ii) Obama is not eligible to be President as he is not a “natural born Citizen” and has refused to tendered any admissible proof that he is even a U.S. Citizen, (iii) therefore, his appointments are void under the holding of Nguyen v. United States and (iv) accordingly, all judicial acts by those judges – specifically including incarcerating prisoners – are void.  I have been in contact with a dozen “prison lawyers” and the Nyguen Motion has been well received. The first Nyguen Motion was filed in Arizona federal court.  The judge in that matter gave the government five (5) months to respond.  The usual response time is ten (10) days.  (Now Dali’s Clock image begins to make sense).

Second, in Sibley vs. Obama, I invoked the ancient writ of quo warranto to have the U.S. District Court compel Mr. Obama to demonstrate that he is eligible for the office of President.  That suit was dismissed by the District Court.  I perfected an appeal to which Mr. Obama moved to Summarily Affirm the District Court dismissal.  I filed my Opposition on March 8, 2013, but the panel of three judges of the Circuit Court have refused to rule upon the government's motion.

Third, in Sibley vs. Alexander et al – which is a class action complaint filed in D.C. Superior Court against the District of Columbia members of the so-called Electoral College – Judge Mott dismissed the suit on March 5, 2013.  I filed on March 12, 2013, a Motion to Vacate claiming the Order was asinine.  Judge Mott still has not ruled on that Motion to Vacate.

Fourth, in Sibley v D.C. Board of Elections which invoked an obscure D.C. law that allows a D.C. voter to mount a post-election challenge to an elected officials qualification for office, the Court ruled on March 13, 2013, that because it refused to address the case until after the inauguration of Mr. Obama, the matter is now "moot" and must be dismissed.  As no appeal is allowed of that decision, I have sued the judges of the DC Court of Appeal personally claiming in essence that for them to refuse to rule promptly in a matter so as to render it moot is judicial malfeasance warranting imposition of personally liability.  Not on my watch will such judicial hi-jinks go unchallenged.

Last, I know that I am making progress as my blog posts are being spammed by Obots seeking to prevent clear discussion of the issues I raise. Clearly, the idea of civilized resolution of a very serious question through my exercise of the rights of First Amendment Petitioning and Freedom of the Press terrifies these anonymous tyrants.  I think that is the reason our wise Framers added it to the Constitution so shortly after they realized what they had created and the dangers a federal government posed to individual rights.


Marc Smith said...

--in olden days, the aggrieved party would open up a can of whoop-ass on these rogue judges- but we are a civilized people today, who are expected to just take it up the keester when elected officials ignore the rule of law in order to protect corrupt politicians. Unfortunately for them, all they get for protecting Obama is adding themselves on as principals in the Obama identity fraud criminal enterprise.

Anonymous said...

The Obamunists and their court minions and intimidees have an unlimited amount of willingness to engage in non-feasance and misfeasance but until all appeals have been exhausted in all cases, the chance of hitting a home-run still exists.
I hope that there is a break in their road-blocks at some point though a corrupt court system has no real public process of redress unless the judges are elected and then held accountable.

Hopefully the Alabama case which will be before Judge Moore's court will not be allowed to die on the vine or be tossed out without justification, or tried and unjustly decided.

I've never heard of you before, not until this posting was carried at Birth Report.com, so it's good to know that there are fronts in this war that aren't even widely known. I hope you have all the support you could use. I'll try to send you some material that I believe could be crucial someday, as it fully and clearly explains the true history and meaning of the words "natural born citizen", "born citizen", "citizen", "natural born subject", "born subject", "alien born subject", "jurisdiction" "subject to", and "resident".

Adrien Nash http://obama--nation.com (h2ooflife.wordpress.com)

Anonymous said...

There is certainly a great deal to learn about this topic.
I like all the points you've made.

Check out my website on front page

Anonymous said...

Yes! Finally someone writes about sun.

My weblog ... more information

Anonymous said...

Very shortly this web site will be famous among all blogging visitors,
due to it's good articles or reviews

Also visit my web-site: he has a good point

Anonymous said...

You made some good points there. I checked on the net for additional information about the
issue and found most people will go along with your
views on this web site.

my weblog; celebrity news

Anonymous said...

Lisa Ann y Tori Black, two of the fleshlight
features a special endcap that can be accessed with the user's OS modification. When collecting everything for your inbox, it's not
the time to browse through as many websites as you like.

Anonymous said...

Great blog right here! Also your site lots up very
fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I am getting
your associate link to your host? I wish my site
loaded up as quickly as yours lol

my web page; carpet stain removal

Post a Comment

Play nice!