I Inject A Stuxnet-Like Motion Challenging Obama's Eligibility Into The Federal Criminal Justice Network

Stuxnet is a computer “worm” which spreads indiscriminately over computer networks.  It includes a highly specialized malware payload that is designed to target only certain supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems that are configured to control and monitor specific industrial processes.  In Stuxnet’s case, that SCADA system was the uranium enrichment infrastructure in Iran.  Its success was spectacular.

I have released an analogous legal “worm” into an analogous network – the federal criminal justice system.  The “worm” is my “Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Application for Issuance of Subpoenas” which I have sent to a number of federal prisoners and their criminal defense attorneys.  This legal “worm” will travel in that network until it reaches its intended target: individuals indicted/convicted of violating the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERA”).

The Motion makes the simple argument that: (i) no federal law is valid under Article I, § 7, cl. 2, of the Constitution unless it is presented to the President, (ii) Obama is not a legitimate President and thus (iii) his signing of FERA is void. Accordingly, every person charged and/or convicted under FERA is entitled to be released.

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees: “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall . . .  have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.”  Thus the Motion demands federal subpoenas for Obama’s: (i) certificates of live birth, (ii) college applications from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School, (iii) U.S. Passport application, (iv) Social Security application and (v) Selective Service registration information – documents Obama has refused to reveal despite repeated requests.

Like the Stuxnet computer virus, my Motion will circulate among the prison population and criminal defense bar; both of which are very adept at bringing legal pleadings to Court.  Once the Motion is properly presented, the Courts will be forced to deal with the merits of Obama’s legitimacy.  The doctrine of "standing" will no longer be a barrier to adjudication. My Motion forces the Courts to make the choice of issuing the requested subpoenas – thereby finally settling the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be President – or affirming that the Sixth Amendment has been repealed by Judicial fiat because it threatens the status quo.  Either way, we will know where we stand as a People and whether it is time to convene a Constitutional Convention to re-assert our fundamental rights in a federal judicial system which has evolved to ignore those sacred rights when they challenge the interests of the entrenched ruling class.