Justice Delayed, Justice Denied and the Number 23

It was no surprise to me that last Friday the Supreme Court denied my request that they expedite the determination of my petition which sought to compel the District Court to expedite resolution of my quo warranto suit against Barack Hussein Obama, II.


It is particularly saddening however.  As of Friday, twenty-three (23) magistrates (1 District Court judge, 13 Circuit Court judges and 9 Supreme Court Justices) have refused to promptly adjudicate a seminal question:  What does the eligibility requirement of Article II, Section 1 that a President be a "natural born Citizen" mean?  That question has never been directly answered by a federal court; though the considered weight of the legal scholarship on that issue persuasively concludes it means: (i) born in the United States, (ii) of two United States citizens.  Clearly, Mr. Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen.  Ergo, Mr. Obama is not eligible to be President.  In the 19th Century, that refusal to adjudicate would have been considered "treason to the Constitution" and a magistrate might well have lost his life-time appointment to the bench.


But what of the number 23? I don't mean to go all Kabbalah but I am headed now to the Grand Jury as that is last bastion of the citizen's right to compel their government to comply with the law.  How many jurors are there on the Grand Jury?  That's right, Twenty Three.