tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1082955825830729884.post3128037461195511386..comments2023-09-14T18:55:54.390-04:00Comments on Amo Probos: In Re: Douglas Vogt -- Part IIMontgomery Blair Sibleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07526912942989615081noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1082955825830729884.post-43357662319421091082013-11-28T14:01:21.482-05:002013-11-28T14:01:21.482-05:00Federal District Court judges have dismissed 50 or...Federal District Court judges have dismissed 50 or more CIVIL lawsuits against Obama by ruling that the Plaintiffs lacked proper "standing" (being directly and personally damaged) to file their CIVIL lawsuits, thus erecting and maintaining an unbreachable protective legal wall around President Obama. Vogt, with Sibley's help, has obeyed the US Criminal Code, which does not require "standing" and which REQUIRES any person with knowledge of a federal crime or treason to inform, and to provide any existing evidence, to a federal judge that a Federal crime has been committed-- in this case by President Obama. Under the US Criminal Code, a judge who receives notice of a crime, which is "in the public interest" to investigate, MUST convene a federal grand jury to investigate the crime and, if appropriate, indict the perpetrators of that crime. Voght's obedience to the US Criminal Code is admirable, and coincidently avoids having to breach Obama's protective legal wall based on the "standing" doctrine. If Vogt fails, at the District Court level, it will be because all 625 Federal District Court judges chose to ignore, and to disobey, applicable sections of the US Criminal Code, thus making themselves party to the crime Vogt has brought to their attention.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1082955825830729884.post-81827045918356269352013-11-28T09:44:25.437-05:002013-11-28T09:44:25.437-05:00I thought you were disbarred? Of course crapping t...I thought you were disbarred? Of course crapping the work of these two buffoons Vogt and Irey on the courts would probably fall short of the (unauthorized) practice of law. Frank Baileyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18341411600524616546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1082955825830729884.post-8870952738079023682013-11-27T21:35:27.460-05:002013-11-27T21:35:27.460-05:00This is very very bad legal advice that you are gi...This is very very bad legal advice that you are giving. It has the potential to do a great deal of harm to your client. The best thing you could do for Mr. Vogt would be to advise him to get a second legal opinion from a competent counselor.MarsTheDestroyernoreply@blogger.com